|
Home | About Us | Archive | Glossary | Contact Us |
|
|
Pricing Strategies: A Delicate Balance – Part 1 of a 3-Part Series By Dan Mitchell, Executive Director of ACE-Net.
|
|||
|
Entrepreneurs need to develop an estimate of when their
start-up companies would break even on a cash
basis – breakeven defined as when the first
positive cash flows might occur and when cash
flows are positive cumulatively.
To shorten that time, we also recommended
that entrepreneurs be careful to price their new
products or services as high as possible, while
keeping their unit costs as low as possible
without compromising quality.
But, how does one do that?
Especially if the product or service is
unique? This
article addresses how to determine what price to
charge to maximize cash flow. The most common approach is to look at what competition is
charging. An
ACE-net business plan must always address this
issue, even if there is no direct competition,
due to the product or service's uniqueness.
The entrepreneur, in this case, must draw
on analogy – identifying products and service
targeted at the same potential customers he or
she is targeting. Once he or she has identified competition and pricing, a
variety of pricing strategies exist.
The two most common relate to the
business goals of the entrepreneur and the type
of market in question.
The most common markets ACE-net listed
business plans aim at are either consumer or
technology markets. In general, the major business goal for a consumer product
company is to capture maximum market share.
Consumers have so many choices in the US,
that they are sensitive to even modest price
differences.
These products also tend to be more in
the nature of commodities – like minerals and
oil, and consumers can be quite fickle if a new
entrant to the market offers attractive prices
relative to the alternatives. So, the pricing strategy for an innovative consumer product
might be to price below competitors.
Entrepreneurs in these markets should,
however, be careful not to price too low below
the alternatives – the old saying “You get
what you pay for” clearly applies.
Pricing too low below the competition can
backfire – putting too tight a squeeze on
margins, could put the entrepreneur in the
highly dangerous position of not being ever able
to “make it up on volume”, as many of the
fast food chains have found out.
He or she will just run out of cash all
the more quickly.
The entrepreneur needs to be careful not
to place too low a value on the innovativeness
of the new product or service, even if it is
only an incremental value-added to the consumer. For technology-based companies, a different pricing strategy
applies. In
most cases, the entrepreneur has committed far
more resources to investments in research and
development (R&D) than a consumer products
company. Pharmaceutical
companies spend 30-40% of sales on R&D,
whereas consumer products companies are more
likely to spend less than 10%.
The business goal of technology companies
is to maximize profits, so as to recoup that
R&D investment as quickly as possible.
Pricing to maximize profits will also
help cash flow.
The suggested strategy for these
technology industries is to price above the
competition.
If the new product provides a truly
value-added element in the eyes of the customer,
and if the product is the right product,
entering the right markets, at the right time,
the customer will gladly pay the premium.
Even if the value-added is only
incremental, as long as it is unique, the
customer will still gladly pay the premium. Rather than attempting to put a price tag on the deal, entrepreneurs should focus intently on the issue of when cash flows might become positive and explained the whys and hows of estimating cash flows and the importance of pricing the new service or product at the price the market will bear.
|
||||
| Back to: articles home top | ||||